Recently, a news about the recruitment of college students by public institutions to "dig dung" has attracted widespread attention. According to relevant reports, a public institution in a certain place has clearly stated in the recruitment that as long as the applicant is a college graduate, he can serve as a "dung worker" and even enjoy relevant treatment.

The news immediately sparked a heated public debate. Some saw it as an insult to higher education, while others saw it as a discriminatory employment policy.

However, this view is not entirely correct. First of all, the recruitment of college students by public institutions is not a discriminatory behavior, but out of the need for human resource optimization. With the development of society, public institutions also need to constantly replenish fresh blood to adapt to new job demands. And college students have naturally become the preferred source of talent due to their good educational background and high professional skills.

Secondly, for those who aspire to engage in environmental protection, becoming a "manure digger" is also a good career choice. Through this position, they can not only earn a certain amount of income, but also have the opportunity to participate in environmental protection work and make their own contributions to improving the environment.

Finally, we should also see that this is not the practice of all institutions. Some units do not have such regulations, but give more opportunities to other types of employees. We should look at this issue rationally, rather than blindly criticizing or over-interpreting.

In general, the recruitment of college students by public institutions is not a discriminatory act, let alone a bad thing. It is an effective measure to enhance the overall competitiveness and efficiency of the unit. Of course, this also requires us to respect the rights and interests of others, but also take into account our own work needs and conditions, and make rational use of resources.